Showing posts with label Christ. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Christ. Show all posts

Tuesday, February 25, 2014

Jonathan Edwards on David as a Type of Christ

From my earliest days as a believer I have had a fascination with the biblical and typological parallels between King David and Jesus. Much has been written on this subject, but recently I stumbled across Jonathan Edwards’ excellent exposition of David as a type of Christ in “Types of the Messiah” in his volume on Typology. Here are the historico-typological parallels from which he set out David, his life, offices and experiences as Covenantal and typological preparations for the Messiah:


“There is yet a more remarkable, manifest and manifold agreement between the things said of David in his history and the things said of the Messiah in the prophecies. His name, David, signifies beloved, as the prophecies do represent the Messiah as in a peculiar and transcendent manner the beloved of God. David was God’s elect in an eminent manner. Saul was the king whom the people chose (1 Samuel 8:18 and 1 Samuel 12:13). But David was the king whom God chose, one whom he found and pitched upon according to his own mind, without any concern of man in the affair and contrary to what men would have chosen. When Jesse caused all his elder sons to pass before Samuel, God said concerning one and another of them, “The Lord hath not chosen this, neither hath the Lord chosen this,” etc. [1 Samuel 16:8–10]. See 1 Chronicles 28:4: there David says, “The Lord God of Israel chose me before all the house of my father to be king over Israel forever: for he hath chosen Judah to be the ruler; and of the house of Judah, the house of my father; and among the sons of my father he liked me to make me king over all Israel.” (See Psalms 78:67–70.) Psalms 89:3, “I have made a covenant with my chosen, I have sworn unto David my servant”; agreeable to Isaiah 42:1, “Mine elect, in whom my soul delighteth; I have put my spirit upon him: he shall bring forth judgment to the Gentiles,” and Isaiah 49:7, “And he shall choose thee.” He was a king of God’s finding and providing, and [God] speaks of him as his king. 1 Samuel 16:1, “I will send thee to Jesse… for I have provided me a king among his sons.” 2 Samuel 22:51, “He is the tower of salvation for his king”; agreeable to Psalms 2:6, “I have set my king on my holy hill of Zion.” He is spoken of as a man after God’s own heart, and one in whom God delighted. 2 Samuel 22:20, “He delivered me, because he delighted in me”; agreeable to Isaiah 42:1, “Behold my servant, whom I uphold; mine elect, in whom my soul delighteth.”


David was in a very eminent manner God’s anointed or messiah (as the word is), and is so spoken of. 2 Samuel 22:51, “He showeth mercy to his anointed, unto David.” And 2 Samuel 23:1, “David the son of Jesse… the man who was raised up on high, the anointed of the God of Jacob.” Psalms 89:19–20, “I have exalted one chosen out of the people. I have found David my servant; with my holy oil have I anointed him.” Samuel anointed him with peculiar solemnity (1 Samuel 16:13). (See how this agrees with the prophecies of the Messiah, “Prophecies of the Messiah” §91.)4


David’s anointing remarkably agrees with what the prophecies say of the anointing of the Messiah, who speak of it as a being anointed with the Spirit of God. So David was anointed with the Spirit of God at the same time that he was anointed with oil. 1 Samuel 16:13, “And Samuel took the horn of oil, and anointed him in the midst of his brethren: and the Spirit of the Lord came upon David from that day forward.” (See “Fulfillment of Prophecies” §32.)5


David is spoken of as being a poor man, of a low family and in mean circumstances. 1 Samuel 18:23, “I am a poor man, and lightly esteemed.” 2 Samuel 7:18, “Who am I? and what is my house, that thou hast brought me hitherto?” Agreeable to this, it is said of the Messiah in the prophecies that he was a root out of a dry ground, that he was a low tree [Isaiah 52:3, Ezekiel 17:24].


David is spoken of as an eminently holy person, a man after God’s own heart. He is spoken of in the history of the kings of Judah as one whose heart was perfect with the Lord his God (1 Kings 11:4); one that went fully after the Lord (1 Kings 11:6); one that did that that was right in the eyes of the Lord (1 Kings 15:11, 2 Kings 18:3, 2 Chronicles 28:1 and 2 Chronicles 29:2). He is spoken of as pure and upright [and] righteous; one that had clean hands; that kept the ways of the Lord and did not wickedly depart from God (2 Samuel 22:21–27). (See how this agrees with what is said in the prophecies of the Messiah, “Fulfillment of Prophecies” §27.)6


David was the youngest son of Jesse, as the Messiah in the prophecies is spoken of as coming in the latter days. He has frequently the appellation of “God’s servant.” It would be endless to mention all the places; see ‘em in the Concordance under the word Servant DAVID.”7 So has the Messiah often this appellation in the prophecies (Isaiah 42:1, Isaiah 42:19, and Isaiah 49:3, Isaiah 49:6, and Isaiah 52:13 and Isaiah 53:11; Zechariah 3:8).


David’s outward appearance was not such as would have recommended him to the esteem and choice of men as a person fit for rule and victory, but on the contrary such as tended to cause men to despise him as a candidate for such things. 1 Samuel 16:7, “Look not on his countenance, or on the height of his stature… for man looketh on the outward appearance, but the Lord looketh on the heart.” 1 Samuel 17:42, “And when the Philistine looked about, and saw David, he disdained him: for he was but a youth.” 1 Samuel 17:56, “Inquire whose son this stripling is.” Eliab, his elder brother, thought him fitter to [be] with the sheep than to come to the army (1 Samuel 17:28); agreeable to Isaiah 53:2, “He shall grow up before him as a tender plant, as a root out of a dry ground: he hath no form nor comeliness; and when we shall see him, there is no beauty that we should desire him.” David appeared unexpectedly. Samuel expected a man of great stature, and appearing outwardly like a man of valor; and therefore when he saw Eliab, David’s elder brother, that had such an appearance, he said, “Surely the Lord’s anointed is before him” [1 Samuel 16:6]. His appearance was astonishing to Goliath and to Saul. So the prophecies represent the Messiah’s appearance as unexpected and astonishing, being so mean. Isaiah 52:14, “Many were astonished at thee; his visage was so marred more than any man.”


But yet David was ruddy and of a fair countenance, and goodly to look to (1 Samuel 16:12 and 1 Samuel 17:42); agreeable to Psalms 45:2, “Thou art fairer than the children of men.” Canticles 5:10, “My beloved is white and ruddy, the chiefest among ten thousands.”


He was anointed king after offering sacrifice (1 Samuel 16). So the prophecies represent the Messiah’s exaltation to his kingdom, after he had by his sufferings offered up a sacrifice to atone for the sins of men. (See “Fulfillment of Prophecies” §74–81 and §87–88.)8 David says of himself, 1 Chronicles 28:4, “The Lord God of Israel chose me to be king over Israel forever.” And God says to him, 2 Samuel 7:16, “And thine house and thy kingdom shall be established forever before thee: thy throne shall be established forever.” (See how agreeable this is to the prophecies of the Messiah, “Fulfillment of Prophecies” §166).9


David by occupation was a shepherd, and afterwards was made a shepherd to God’s Israel. Psalms 78:70–71, “He chose David his servant, and took him from the sheepfolds: From following the ewes great with young he brought him to feed Jacob his people, and Israel his inheritance.” This is agreeable to many prophecies of the Messiah, who is often spoken of in them as the shepherd of God’s people, and therein is expressly compared to David. Isaiah 40:11, “He shall feed his flock like a shepherd.” Isaiah 49:9–10, “They shall feed in the ways, and their pastures shall be in all high places. They shall not hunger nor thirst; neither shall the heat nor sun smite them: for he that hath mercy on them shall lead them, by the springs of water shall he guide them.” Jeremiah 23:4–5, “And I will set up shepherds over them which shall feed them… I will raise up unto David a righteous Branch, and a King shall reign and prosper, and shall execute judgment and justice in the earth.” Ezekiel 34:23, “And I will set up one shepherd over them, and he shall feed them, even my servant David; he shall feed them, and shall be their shepherd.” Ezekiel 37:24, “And David my servant shall be king over them; and they all shall have one shepherd.” Canticles 1:7, “Tell me, O thou whom my soul loveth, where thou feedest, where thou makest thy flock to rest at noon.”


David was of a humble, meek and merciful spirit (1 Samuel 18:23; 2 Samuel 6:21–22 and 2 Samuel 7:18; 1 Samuel 24, throughout, and 1 Samuel 26 throughout; 2 Samuel 2:5, 2 Samuel 2:21, 1 and 2 Samuel 4:9–12 and 2 Samuel 7:18; 2 Samuel 22:26; and many places in the Psalms show the same spirit, too many to be mentioned). This is agreeable to what is said of the Messiah, Zechariah 9:9, “He is just, and having salvation; lowly, and riding on an ass, and a colt the foal of an ass.” Isaiah 42:3, “A bruised reed shall he not break, and the smoking flax shall he not quench: he shall bring forth judgment unto truth.” Isaiah 40:11, “He shall gather the lambs with his arm, and carry them in his bosom, and shall gently lead those that are with young.” Isaiah 53:7, “He is brought as a lamb to the slaughter, as a sheep before his shearers is dumb, so he opened not his mouth.”


David was a person that was eminent for wisdom and prudence. 1 Samuel 16:18, “Behold, I have seen a son of Jesse… prudent in matters.” And 1 Samuel 18:5, “And David behaved himself wisely.” 1 Samuel 18:14, “And David behaved himself wisely in all his ways.” 1 Samuel 18:30, “David behaved himself more wisely than all the servants of Saul.” Psalms 78:72, “He guided them by the skilfulness of his hands.” This is agreeable to what is said of the Messiah (Isaiah 9:6, Isaiah 11:2–3 and Isaiah 41:28–29 with Isaiah 42:1, Isaiah 52:13, Zechariah 3:7).


David is said to be “a mighty valiant man.” 1 Samuel 16:18, “Behold, I have seen a son of Jesse, a mighty valiant man.” This is agreeable to Psalms 45:3, “Gird thy sword upon thy thigh, O most mighty, with thy glory and thy majesty.” Isaiah 63:1, “Who is this travelling in the greatness of his strength? I that speak in righteousness, mighty to save.” And in this very thing the Messiah is compared to David. Psalms 89:19–20, “I have laid help upon one that is mighty; I have exalted one chosen out of the people. I have found David my servant.”


David was a sweet musician, [and] was preferred as such to all that were to be found in Israel to relieve Saul in his melancholy. He is called “the sweet psalmist of Israel” (2 Samuel 23:1). He lead the whole church of Israel in their praises. He instituted the order of singers and musicians in the house of [God]. He delivered to the church the book of songs they were to use in their ordinary public worship. This is most agreeable to the prophecies of the Messiah, which do everywhere represent that he should introduce the most pleasant, joyful, glorious state of the church, wherein they should abound in the praises of God, and the world [be] filled with sweet and joyful songs after sorrow and weeping; wherein songs should be heard from the utmost ends of the earth, and all nations should sing, and the mountains and trees of the field, and all creatures, sun, moon and stars, heaven and earth, should break forth into singing; and even the dead should awake and sing, and the lower parts of the earth should shout, and the tongue of the dumb should sing, and the dragons and all deeps; the barren, the prisoners, the desolate and mourners should sing; and that all nations should come and sing in the height of Zion:2 they should sing aloud and sing a new song or in a new manner, with music and praises excelling all that ever [had] been before. The particular texts are too many to enumerate.


The patriarch from whom Christ descends, for this reason [is] called “Judah,” i.e. “praise,” and the Messiah is represented as leading the church of God in their sweet and joyful songs. Psalms 22:22, “I will declare thy name unto my brethren: in the midst of the congregation I will praise thee.” Psalms 22:25, “My praise shall be of thee in the great congregation.” Psalms 69:30, Psalms 69:32, “I will praise the name of God with a song, and will magnify him with thanksgiving.… The humble shall see this, and be glad.” Psalms 69:34, “Let the heaven and the earth praise him, the seas, and everything that moveth therein.” (See also Psalms 138:1–5.) We read in Psalms 89:15 of the joyful sound that shall be at that time, and the day of the Messiah’s kingdom is compared to the spring, the time of the singing of birds (Canticles 2).


David slew a lion and bear and delivered a lamb out of their mouths. So the enemies of the Messiah and his people are in the prophecies compared to a lion, as was observed before (p. 256).3 So the prophetical representations made of God’s people, that are delivered by the Messiah, well agree with the symbol of a lamb. The prophecies represent ‘em as feeble, poor and defenseless in them[selves], and as meek and harmless (Psalms 45:4, and Psalms 22:26, and Psalms 69:32, and Psalms 147:6 and Psalms 149:4; Isaiah 11:4 and Isaiah 29:19 and Isaiah 61:1).


David comes to the camp of Israel to save them from Goliath and the Philistines, just at a time when they were in special and immediate danger, when the host were going forth to the fight and shouted for the battle. So the Messiah in the prophecies is represented as appearing to save his people at the time of their extremity. So God appeared for the redemption of his people out of Egypt. But Balaam, prophesying of the redemption of the Messiah (Numbers 23:23), says, “According to this time shall it be said of Jacob and of Israel, What hath God wrought!” This also is agreeable to that prophecy of the deliverance of God’s people in the Messiah’s times, Deuteronomy 32:36, “The Lord shall judge his people, and repent himself for his servants, when he seeth that their power is gone, and there is none shut up, or left.” (See Psalms 14, and Psalms 53, and Psalms 21:11–12, and Psalms 46, and Psalms 58:7–11, and Psalms 60, and Psalms 118:10–29 and Psalms 138:7; Isaiah 8:9–22; Isaiah 9:1–7, and Isaiah 25:4–5, and Isaiah 26:16–21, and Isaiah 28:21–22, and Isaiah 29:5–8, and Isaiah 30:27–30, and Isaiah 31:4–5, and Isaiah 40:28–31, and Isaiah 41 throughout, and Isaiah 42:1–4, and Isaiah 51:7–23 and many other places.)


David was hated and envied by his brethren and misused by ‘em when he came to ‘em on a kind errand from his father, to bring them provision. Herein he resembled the Messiah, as Joseph did. (See “Fulfillment of Prophecies,” concerning the Jews’ rejection of the Messiah.)4


David kills Goliath, who in his huge stature, great strength, with his mighty army and exceeding pride, much resembled the devil, according to the representations of the devil in the prophecies of the Messiah’s conquest and destruction of him, who is called “Leviathan” (Isaiah 27:1); which in the Old Testament is represented as an huge and terrible creature, of vast strength and impenetrable armor, disdaining the weapons and strength of his enemies, and the king over all the children of pride (Job 41).


David went against Goliath without carnal weapons. (See “Fulfillment of Prophecies” §107.)5 David prevailed against Goliath with a sling and a stone, which is agreeable to Zechariah 9:15, “The Lord of hosts shall defend them; and they shall devour, and subdue with sling stones.”


David, when going against Goliath, took strength out of the brook in the way; agreeable to that concerning the Messiah, Psalms 110:6–7, “He shall fill the places with the dead bodies; he shall wound the heads over many countries. He shall drink of the brook in the way: therefore shall he lift up the head.”


David cut off the head of the Philistine with his own sword. So it may be clearly gathered from what the prophecies say of the Messiah’s suffering, and that from the cruelty of his enemies, and the consequence of them with respect to his exaltation and victory over his enemies, that the Messiah shall destroy Satan with his own weapons. (See “Fulfillment of Prophecies” §97, and the context of the texts there referred to.)6 David carried the head of Goliath to Jerusalem, which is agreeable to what is foretold of the Messiah. Psalms 68:18, “Thou hast ascended on high, thou hast led captivity captive,” together with the context.


David put Goliath’s armor in his tent, which is agreeable to Psalms 76:2–3, “In Salem is his tabernacle” (or “tent”), “and his dwelling place in Zion. There brake he the arrows of the bow, the shield, the sword, and the battle.”


When Saul saw David returning from his victory, [he] says over and over with great admiration concerning him, “Whose son is this youth?” (1 Samuel 17:55), “Inquire whose son this stripling is” (1 Samuel 17:56), “Whose son art thou?” (1 Samuel 17:58); agreeable to Psalms 24:8, “Who is this king of glory?” Again Psalms 24:10, and Isaiah 63:1, “Who is this that cometh from Edom, with dyed garments from Bosrah? this that is glorious in his apparel, travelling in the greatness of his strength?” The daughters of Israel went forth to meet King David and sang praises to him when he returned from the slaughter of the Philistine, agreeable to Psalms 24, and Psalms 68 and many other places.


David obtained his wife by exposing his life in battle with the Philistines and in destroying them, agreeable to what is prophesied of the Messiah’s sufferings and death, his conflict with and victory over his enemies, and his redemption of his church by this means, and the consequent joy of espousals with the church.


David was a great savior. He saved Israel from Goliath and the Philistines, and from all their enemies round about. 2 Samuel 3:18, “The Lord hath spoken of David, saying, By the hand of my servant David will I save my people Israel out of the hand of the Philistines, and out of the hand of all their enemies,” agreeable to the prophecies of the Messiah. David was greatly persecuted and his life sought unjustly, agreeable to prophecies of the Messiah.


David’s marriage with Abigail, the wife of a son of Belial, a virtuous woman and of a beautiful countenance, is agreeable to innumerable prophecies that represent the church of the Messiah that the prophecies speak of as his spouse, as brought into that happy state from a state of guilt and bondage to sin. (See “Fulfillment of Prophecies,” in very many sections.)7


David was resorted to by everyone that was in distress, and everyone that was in debt, and everyone that was bitter of soul, and he became their captain; which is agreeable to innumerable prophecies that represent the Messiah as the captain and savior of the poor, afflicted, distressed, sinners and prisoners, etc. David’s host is compared to the host of God (1 Chronicles 12:22), which is agreeable to what the prophecies represent of the divinity of the Messiah, and God’s people in his times, and under him becoming as an host of mighty valiant men that shall thresh the mountains and tread down their enemies, {and shall make the hills as chaff} [Isaiah 41:15]. David, as it were raised from the dead, was wonderfully delivered from death when in great danger, was brought back from the wilderness and from banishment and from caves of the earth that resembled the grave. (Psalms 30:3, “O Lord, thou hast brought up my soul from the grave.”) Which is agreeable to the prophecies of the Messiah’s restoration from his low and suffering state and resurrection from death.


David was made king over the strong city Hebron, that had been taken from the Anakims, the gigantic enemies of God’s people; which is agreeable to the prophecies of the Messiah’s conquering the strong city, and bringing low the lofty city, conquering the devil and taking possession of the mightiest and strongest kingdoms of this world. (See “Fulfillment of Prophecies” §154.)8


David’s followers, that came to him to make him king, were men of understanding, mighty men of valor, and men of a perfect heart (1 Chronicles 12); which is agreeable to what the prophecies represent of the followers of the Messiah. David was made king by the act and choice both of God and his people (1 Chronicles 11:1–3 and 1 Chronicles 12; 2 Samuel 2:4, 2 Samuel 5:1–3). This is agreeable to the prophecies of the Messiah. Hosea 1:11, “Then shall the children of Judah and the children of Israel be gathered together, and appoint themselves one head.” David was made king with great feasting and rejoicing (1 Chronicles 12:39–40), which is agreeable to what the prophecies do abundantly represent of the joy of the introduction of the Messiah’s kingdom.


David was the first king of Jerusalem, that city so often spoken of in the prophecies as a type of the church of the Messiah. David insulted the idols as lame and blind and destroyed them (2 Samuel 5:21), agreeable to ["Fulfillment of Prophecies"] §132–35 and §153.9 David conquered the strongest hold of the Jebusites and reigned there. (See what was said before concerning his reigning in Hebron.)1 He rescued Zion from the strong possession of idols and the enemies of God’s people, and reigned in Mt. Zion, agreeable to innumerable prophecies of the Messiah. David’s kingdom gradually increased from small beginnings till he had subdued all his enemies. (See “[Fulfillment of] Prophecies of Messiah” §123–26 and §162–63.)2


It was first in David’s time that God chose Him a place to put His name there. Through him God made Jerusalem His holy city, and the place of His special, gracious residence, agreeable to the prophecies of the Messiah (Psalms 132:13–18, Zechariah 1:17 and Zechariah 2:12, and Isaiah 14:1). David provided a settled habitation for God, and God is represented as through his favor to David taking up a settled abode with them, no more walking in a moveable tent and tabernacle that might be taken down, and giving Israel a constant abode, that they might no more be afflicted and carried into captivity (2 Samuel 7:6, 2 Samuel 7:10, 2 Samuel 7:24), according to many prophecies of the Messiah. David provided a place for God’s habitation in Zion and in Mt. Moriah, agreeable to Zechariah 6:12, “He shall build the temple of the Lord.”


David brought up the ark to abide in the midst of God’s people after it had departed into the land of the Philistines and had long remained in the utmost confines of the land in Kirjathjearim, which is agreeable to what the prophecies represent of the benefit the people of God in the Messiah’s days shall receive in the return of the tokens of God’s presence to them after long absence, and his placing his tabernacle in the midst of them, and his soul’s no more abhorring them.


David ascended into the hill of the Lord with the ark at the head of all Israel, rejoicing, and gave gifts to men (2 Samuel 6); but this is agreeable to what is said of the ascension of the Messiah (Psalms 68). David ascended with the ark wherein was the Law of God, as the Messiah ascended with that human nature that was the cabinet of the Law. David, after he had ascended, returned to bless his household, as the Messiah especially blessed his church after his ascension. (See “Fulfillment of Prophecies.”)3 But Michal, his first wife, despised him for his abasement and received no part in this blessing, but was as it were repudiated; as the prophecies do represent the Jews, the Messiah’s first wife, as despising the Messiah for his humiliation and so as not receiving the benefits and blessings that he should bestow after his ascension, but as being repudiated.


When David came to the crown, God broke forth on his enemies as the breach of water, and in a dreadful storm of thunder, fire and hail (2 Samuel 5:20, 1 Chronicles 14:11 and Psalms 18); which is agreeable to Isaiah 24:18–20, Daniel 9:26, Ezekiel 38:22, Isaiah 30:30 and Isaiah 32:19. Yea, the destruction of the enemies of God’s people in the days of the Messiah is expressly compared to that very breaking forth of God on the enemies of David. Isaiah 28:21, “For the Lord shall rise up as in Mt. Perazim.”


The king of Tyre (that was above all others in the world a city noted for merchandise and seafaring) built David an house (2 Samuel 5:11, 1 Chronicles 14:1). (See “Fulfillment of Prophecies” §154.)4


David was not only a king, but a great prophet (2 Samuel 23:2), and also was a priest. He officiated as such on occasion of the bringing up of the ark (2 Samuel 6:13–14, 2 Samuel 6:17–18; 1 Chronicles 15:27). Again, he officiated as such (review me and 1 Chronicles 16:21–36), and in some respects he officiated as chief in all sacerdotal matters, ordering all things in the house of God, directing and ordering the priests in things relating to their function and disposing them into courses, etc. So the prophecies do abundantly represent the Messiah as prophet, priest and king. (See “Prophecies of the Messiah” and “Fulfillment of Prophecies,” in many parts.)5


David is spoken of as the man that was “raised up on high” [2 Samuel 23:1], which is agreeable to what is said of the Messiah in Psalms 89:19, “I have exalted one chosen out of the people.” And Psalms 89:27, “I will make him my first-born, higher than the kings of the earth.” Psalms 45:6, “Thy throne, O God, is forever.” And Psalms 110:1, “Sit thou on my right hand,” and innumerable other places. He is spoken of as eminently a just ruler, one that fed God’s people in the integrity of his heart and executed judgment and justice (2 Samuel 8:15, 1 Chronicles 18:14); which is agreeable to that which is abundantly spoken of the Messiah, as the just ruler over men; the king that shall reign in righteousness; he that shall sit on the throne of his father David, to order and establish it with judgment and justice; the righteous branch that shall grow up to David, etc.6 God made David a name like the name of the great men that are in the earth (2 Samuel 7:9; see also 2 Samuel 8:13), agreeable to Isaiah 53:12, “Therefore will I divide him a portion with the great.” “The fame of David went out into all lands; and the Lord brought the fear of him upon all nations” (1 Chronicles 14:17), agreeable to Psalms 45:17, “I will make thy name to be remembered”; Psalms 72:11, “All nations shall serve him”; Psalms 72:17, “His name shall endure forever,” and innumerable other places.


David carried up the ark clothed with a robe of fine linen (1 Chronicles 15:27), agreeable to Isaiah 61:10, “He hath clothed me with the garments of salvation, he hath covered me with a robe of righteousness.” Zechariah 3:4, “Take away the filthy garments from him. And unto him he said, Behold, I have caused thine iniquity to pass from thee, and I will clothe thee with change of raiment.” (See also Daniel 10:5, compared with Daniel 10:13 and Daniel 10:21, and Daniel 12:1.)


God was with David whithersoever he went, and cut off all his enemies (2 Samuel 7:9 and 2 Samuel 8:6, 2 Samuel 8:14; 1 Chronicles 17:8, 1 Chronicles 17:10 and 1 Chronicles 18:6, 1 Chronicles 18:13; 2 Samuel 22:1–20), agreeable to Psalms 2, and Psalms 45, and Psalms 110, and Psalms 89 and innumerable other places.


David subdued all the remainders of the Canaanites and the ancient heathen inhabitants of the land, and so perfected what Joshua had begun in giving the people. (See what is said of Joshua as a type of the Messiah in this respect, pp. 244–45.)7 David brought it to pass that the Canaanites and enemies of Israel should no longer dwell with them, or [be] mixed among them in the same land. Joel 3:17, “No stranger shall pass through thee any more.” Zechariah 14:21, “In that day there shall be no more the Canaanite in the house of the Lord.” Psalms 69:35–36, “For God will save Zion, and will build the cities of Judah: that they may dwell there, and have it in possession. The seed also of his servants shall inherit it: and they that love thy name shall dwell therein.” Isaiah 65:9–11, “And I will bring forth a seed out of Jacob, and out of Judah an inheritor of my mountains: and mine elect shall inherit it, and my servants shall dwell there. And Sharon shall be a fold of flocks, and the valley of Achor a place for the herds to lie down in, for my people that have sought me. But ye are they that forsake the Lord, that forget my holy mountain, that prepare a table for that troop, and that furnish the drink offering unto that number.” Isaiah 35:8, “An highway shall be there, and a way, and it shall be called The way of holiness; the unclean shall not pass over it.” Ezekiel 20:38, “And I will purge out from among you the rebels, and them that transgress against me: I will bring them forth out of the country where they sojourn, and they shall not enter into the land of Israel.”


David subdued the Philistines, and the Moabites, and Ammonites and the Edomites, agreeable to Isaiah 11:14, Numbers 24:17, Psalms 60:8 and Psalms 108:9, Isaiah 25:10, chs. Isaiah 34 and Isaiah 63, and Ezekiel 35 and Ezekiel 36:5. David’s kingdom reached from the river to the ends of the earth (2 Samuel 8:3; 1 Chronicles 18:3), agreeable to Psalms 72:8, Zechariah 9:10.


David’s reign was a time of the destruction of giants. He slew all the remnant of the race of giants (1 Samuel 17, 2 Samuel 21:18–22 and 2 Samuel 23:20–21, 1 Chronicles 20:4–8 and 1 Chronicles 11:22–23), agreeable to Isaiah 10:33, “And the high ones of stature shall be hewn down, and the haughty shall be humbled.” This seems (as I observed before)8 to be connected with the prophecy in the beginning of the next chapter, in the next verse but one. Isaiah 45:14, “The Sabeans, men of stature, shall come over to thee; in chains shall they come over.” Psalms 76:5, “The stouthearted are spoiled, they have slept their sleep.”


David destroyed the chariots and houghed the horses of the enemies of God’s people (2 Samuel 8:4 and 2 Samuel 10:18, 1 Chronicles 18:4 and 1 Chronicles 19:7), agreeable to Psalms 46:9, “He breaketh the bow, and cutteth the spear in sunder; he burneth the chariot in the fire.” Psalms 76:3, “There brake he the arrows of the bow, the shield, and the sword, and the battle.” Psalms 76:6, “At thy rebuke, O God of Jacob, both the chariot and horse are cast into a dead sleep.” (See also Ezekiel 39:9–10, Ezekiel 39:20 and Zechariah 12:3–4.)


What David says (Psalms 18 and 2 Samuel 22) of the manner in which God appeared for him against his enemies, to destroy them in a terrible tempest with thunder, lightning, earthquake, devouring fire, etc. is agreeable to many things in the prophecies of the Messiah. (See what has before been observed, when speaking of the Deluge, and destruction of Sodom, and the destruction of the Amorites in Joshua’s time.)9


Other kings brought presents unto David and bowed down unto him (2 Samuel 5:11, 1 Chronicles 14:1, 2 Samuel 8:2 and 2 Samuel 8:10, 1 Chronicles 18:10, 2 Samuel 10:19, 1 Chronicles 22:4), agreeable to Psalms 72:10–11 and Psalms 45:12, Psalms 68:29, Isaiah 49:7 and Isaiah 60:9. The honor, dominion and crown of David’s enemies was given unto him (2 Samuel 12:30 and 1 Chronicles 20:2). Ezekiel 21:26, “Thus saith the Lord; Remove the diadem, and take off the crown: this shall not be the same: exalt him that is low, and abase him that is high. Perverted, perverted, perverted will I make it, until he come whose right it is; and I will give it him.”


David’s sons were princes (1 Chronicles 28:1–8). David’s sons were chief rulers or princes (as it is in the margin),1 agreeable to Psalms 45:16, “Instead of thy fathers shall be thy children, whom thou mayest make princes in all the earth.”


David brought the wealth of the heathen into Jerusalem and dedicated it to God, and as it were built the temple with it (2 Samuel 8:11–12, 1 Chronicles 18:11 and 1 Chronicles 26:26–27, and 1 Chronicles 22, throughout, and 1 Chronicles 29); agreeable to Micah 4:13, “Arise, thresh, O daughters of Zion: for I will make thine horn iron, and thy hoofs brass: and thou shalt beat in pieces many people: and I will consecrate their gain unto the Lord, and their substance unto the Lord of the whole earth.” Isaiah 23:17–18, “The Lord will visit Tyre… And her merchandise and hire shall be holiness to the Lord: it shall not be treasured nor laid up; for her merchandise shall be for them that dwell before the Lord, to eat sufficiently, and for durable clothing.” (See also Isaiah 60:5–6, Isaiah 60:9, Isaiah 60:11, Isaiah 60:13, Isaiah 61:6, and Zechariah 14:14.)


David was a mediator to stand between God and the people, both to keep off judgments and the punishment of sin, and also to procure God’s favor towards them. For his sake God granted his gracious presence and favor with Israel (2 Samuel 7:10). Thus we read of favor which God showed to Israel, and witholding judgments from time to time for his servant David’s sake (1 Kings 11:12–13, 1 Kings 11:32, 1 Kings 11:34, 1 Kings 15:4; 2 Kings 8:19, 2 Kings 19:34 and 2 Kings 20:6). And he stood between God and the people of Jerusalem when he saw the sword of justice drawn against it to destroy it (2 Samuel 24:17–25). So the Messiah is spoken of, as in like manner, the mediator, being himself peculiarly God’s elect and beloved, is given for a covenant of the people (Isaiah 42:6 and Isaiah 49:8) and the messenger of the covenant, and a prophet like unto Moses, who was a mediator. And the prophecies speak of the forgiveness of sin, and the greatest mercy towards God’s people, and an everlasting covenant, and the sure mercies of David, as being through the Messiah. (See “Fulfillment of Prophecies” §20–22; also §74–86, §94–96.)2


David as mediator saved the people of Jerusalem from destruction by offering himself to suffer and die by the sword of the destroying angel and by building [an] altar and offering sacrifice (2 Samuel 24:17–25), agreeable to the prophecies of the Messiah. (See “Fulfillment of Prophecies” §74–86.)3


David not only made a tabernacle for God in Mt. Zion, and so provided an habitation for the Lord, but he in effect built the temple. He bought the ground on which it was built, built an altar upon it. He made provision for the building. It was in his heart to build an house to God’s name, and he directed and ordered precisely how it should be built and ordered all its services (1 Chronicles 22–26), agreeable to Zechariah 6:12–13. Herein David was as the Messiah, a prophet like unto Moses, who built the tabernacle and the altar according to the pattern God gave him (as he gave David the pattern of the tabernacle), and gave the ordinances of the house [and] ordered all things appertaining to the worship of the tabernacle.


God by David gave to Israel new ordinances, a new law of worship, appointed many things that were not in the law of Moses, and some things that superseded the ordinances of Moses. This is agreeable to the things said of the Messiah. (See “Fulfillment of Prophecies” §146–47.)4


David made all manner of preparation for the building of the temple, and that in vast abundance, an immense treasure (1 Chronicles 22:14 and 1 Chronicles 28:14–18, 1 Chronicles 29:2–9); agreeable to Isaiah 25:6, “And in this mountain shall the Lord make unto all people a feast of fat things, a feast of wines on the lees, of fat things full of marrow, of wines on the lees well refined.” Isaiah 55:1–9,


Ho, everyone that thirsteth, come ye to the waters, and he that hath no money; come ye, buy, and eat; yea, come, buy wine and milk without money and without price. Wherefore do ye spend money for that which is not bread? and your labor for that which satisfieth not? hearken diligently unto me, and eat ye that which is good, and let your soul delight itself in fatness. Incline your ear, and come unto me: hear, and your soul shall live; and I will make an everlasting covenant with you, even the sure mercies of David. Behold, I have given him for a witness to the people, a leader and commander to the people. Behold, thou shalt call a nation that thou knowest not, and nations that knew not thee shall run unto thee because of the Lord thy God, and for the Holy One of Israel; for he hath glorified thee. Seek ye the Lord while he may be found, call upon him while he is near: Let the wicked forsake his way, and the unrighteous man his thoughts: and let him return unto the Lord, and he will have mercy upon him; and to our God, for he will abundantly pardon. For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways, saith the Lord. For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways, and my thoughts than your thoughts.


(See also “Fulfillment of Prophecies” §20.)5 Haggai 2:7, “I will fill this house with glory.” Jeremiah 33:6, “I will reveal unto them the abundance of truth and peace.” Isaiah 64:4, eye has not seen, nor ear heard, {what God has prepared for him that waits on him}. Isaiah 66:12, “I will extend peace to her as a river.” Psalms 72:3, “The mountains shall bring peace to the people, and the little hills, by righteousness.” Psalms 72:7, there shall be “abundance of peace so long as the moon endureth.” Amos 9:13, “The mountains shall drop sweet wine.” Joel 3:18, “And it shall come to pass in that day, that the mountains shall drop down new wine, and the hills shall flow with milk, and all the rivers of Judah shall flow with water, and a fountain shall come forth out of the house of the Lord, and shall water the valley of Shittim.” And Isaiah 60, throughout, besides the things which the prophecies say of the perfect satisfaction of God’s justice by the sacrifice of the Messiah and the abundance of his righteousness and excellency. David made such great provision for the building of the temple in his trouble by war and exposing his own life, which is agreeable to what the prophecies represent of Christ procuring the immense blessings of his church by his extreme sufferings and precious blood.


David was the head of God’s people, the prince of the congregation of Israel, not only in their civil affairs, but in ecclesiastical affairs also, and their leader in all things appertaining to religion and the worship of God. Herein he was as the Messiah is represented in the prophecies, which speak of Him as a prophet like unto Moses, and as the head of God’s people, as their great king, prophet and priest. And indeed, almost all that the prophecies say of the Messiah does [imply] that he shall be the great head of God’s people in their religious concerns.


David regulated the whole body of the people and brought ‘em into the most exact and beautiful order (1 Chronicles 27), which is agreeable to what is represented of the church in the Messiah’s days, as “beautiful for situation” (review me); “the perfection of beauty” (Psalms 50:2); “an eternal excellency, the joy of many generations” [Isaiah 60:15]; and what is represented in Ezekiel of the exact measures and order of all parts of the temple, the city and the whole land [Ezekiel 40–48].


David built the altar in the threshing floor of Araunah the Jebusite, on Gentile ground, which is agreeable to what the prophecies represent of the church of the Messiah being erected in Gentile lands, and being made up of those that had been sinners.”


1. Ed. Wallace E. AndersonMason I. Lowance, Jr.David H. Watters, Jonathan Edwards “Types of the Messiah” in Typological Writings (WJE Online Vol. 11)  (Yale University Press).

Saturday, February 15, 2014

For whom did Christ die?

Dr. James White v. Dr. Michael Brown


In reflecting on this "debate" Dr. White wrote:


First, I am somewhat uncomfortable with the term “debate” in this instance, for a number of reasons. This might be one of those times where “discussion” is really the better term. The actual interaction time was limited, only about 53 minutes total, after which time our discussion was driven by the audience in the main. And though we both attempted to be as brief and concise as possible, still, without specific time controls, complete equality was not possible to obtain. And particularly in the second discussion we (I think quite properly) had more actual personal interaction on a pastoral level.


Whatever term we choose to describe the discussions, they were most certainly unusual for most of Christian television anywhere in the world, and in Europe in particular. While there may be lots of panel discussions recorded for broadcast, this kind of open and honest disagreement based upon the highest view of Scripture and inspiration, by two participants, both of whom have studied the biblical languages (Michael being the expert in Hebrew, and I having the advantage in Greek), is certainly not your normal fare on what is called Christian television. On that level alone I am very pleased that these programs will be available for viewing for at least the foreseeable future.


This is not the first time Michael and I have demonstrated that you can disagree strongly and still do so respectfully...


Regarding the Atonement Discussion


I did all I could to start the debate on the right foot, which is hard to do in less than five minutes. But I focused upon what must be the heart of any such discussion: the vital relationship between the extent of the atonement and the divine intention of the atonement. This element, together with 1) the covenantal nature of the death of Christ as the very ground and source of the New Covenant and, 2) the intimate, necessary, and glorious nature of Christ’s high priestly role and hence the connection of atonement and intercession, formed the heart of my argument. I believe a fair analysis of the encounter would confirm that these arguments were not undercut by anything Michael offered. Instead, it was plain to me that his opening arguments were based not on the provision of a biblical doctrine of atonement, but upon a general denial of particularity in salvation itself. He focused far more upon emphasizing “all” passages than upon providing any kind of positive doctrine of intentionality or accomplishment in atonement. This was not a failure on Michael’s part, it is the nature of non- Reformed soteriology in general. It simply does not go deeply into the biblical revelation at this point, for the deepest most illuminating texts on this topic (Romans 8, the Hebrews chapters) are all connected to sovereignty, election, priesthood and intercession. This is why Michael was forced (and this, to me, was the deciding moment in the debate) to divide, conceptually and practically, the atoning work of the High Priest and the intercessory work. So, Christ dies for every individual, even for those already under God’s judgment, but Michael sees how impossible it is to keep that priestly work unified, so he denied that Christ is interceding for those who are already under judgment. Now if he could just follow that thought to its conclusion and see the power of it! Instead, he seemed to wish to deny the fact that even in Israel you had the physical offspring of Abraham and the spiritual offspring of Abraham, and that it is the remnant (?e??µµa), those who are of faith, who were in view in the sacrifices and the priestly ministrations. So he wished to insist that the sacrifice of atonement on the day of atonemente was for all of Israel, and hence potential in nature. I disputed this on a few accounts, but time did not allow an in-depth discussion.


I would simply point out that 1) the offering in Leviticus 16 is limited to the covenant people of God; it did not make atonement for the Egyptians or Moabites or Assyrians. It was, by nature, covenantal and hence “limited”;


2) there is good ground for arguing for a limitation even within the Old Covenant context based upon the obedience and faith of the remnant of Israel (many bore in their bodies the covenant sign but were not of the remnant as they were not of faith); but most importantly


3) the New Testament text makes the limitation explicit in the phrase t??? p??se???µe???? d? a?t?? t? ?e?, those drawing near to God through Him (Hebrews 7:25). In any case, the powerful argument based upon Christ’s high priestly ministry, together with the inarguable fact that the ones for whom the sacrifice is offered and the ones for whom the High Priest intercedes are identical, was clearly presented and defended. I truly wonder how many who heard that program heard about these wondrous truths for the first time? What a privilege to have the opportunity to proclaim them!


Of course, if someone in the audience does not remain focused upon the topic, they may well be distracted by the other issues raised, especially by the audience interaction. Texts such as 1 John 2:2, 1 Timothy 4:10, etc., which I have discussed in depth in my published works, again show that the primary objection to particular redemption is found in a rejection of particularity as a whole, i.e., in objections to election. I can only hope that those who found those objections weighty will take the time to dig into the interactions Michael and I had previously on those topics.

Friday, February 14, 2014

Look to Christ, Not to Self — C.H. Spurgeon

“Looking unto Jesus.” – Hebrews 12:2


“It is ever the Holy Spirit’s work to turn our eyes away from self to Jesus; but Satan’s work is just the opposite of this, for he is constantly trying to make us regard ourselves instead of Christ. He insinuates, ‘Your sins are too great for pardon; you have no faith; you do not repent enough; you will never be able to continue to the end; you have not the joy of his children; you have such a wavering hold of Jesus.’ All these are thoughts about self, and we shall never find comfort or assurance by looking within. But the Holy Spirit turns our eyes entirely away from self: he tells us that we are nothing, but that ‘Christ is all in all.’


Remember, therefore, it is not thy hold of Christ that saves thee—it is Christ; it is not thy joy in Christ that saves thee—it is Christ; it is not even faith in Christ, though that be the instrument—it is Christ’s blood and merits; therefore, look not so much to thy hand with which thou art grasping Christ, as to Christ; look not to thy hope, but to Jesus, the source of thy hope; look not to thy faith, but to Jesus, the author and finisher of thy faith. We shall never find happiness by looking at our prayers, our doings, or our feelings; it is what Jesus is, not what we are, that gives rest to the soul. If we would at once overcome Satan and have peace with God, it must be by “looking unto Jesus.” Keep thine eye simply on him; let his death, his sufferings, his merits, his glories, his intercession, be fresh upon thy mind; when thou wakest in the morning look to him; when thou liest down at night look to him. Oh! let not thy hopes or fears come between thee and Jesus; follow hard after him, and he will never fail thee.


‘My hope is built on nothing less
Than Jesus’ blood and righteousness:
I dare not trust the sweetest frame,
But wholly lean on Jesus’ name.’”


- Charles Spurgeon (1834-1892)
taken from: Morning and Evening, Morning devotion for June 28.

Thursday, February 13, 2014

In Christ, Our Suffering Is Not in Vain

Jesus suffered for us. Yet we are called to participate in His suffering. Though He was uniquely the fulfillment of Isaiah’s prophecy, there is still an application of this vocation for us. We are given both the duty and the privilege to participate in the suffering of Christ.


A mysterious reference to this idea is found in the writings of the apostle Paul: “I now rejoice in my sufferings for you, and fill up in my flesh what is lacking in the afflictions of Christ, for the sake of His body, which is the church” (Col. 1:24). Here Paul declared that he rejoiced in his suffering. Surely he did not mean that he enjoyed pain and affliction. Rather, the cause of his joy was found in the meaning of his suffering. He said that he filled up “what is lacking in the afflictions of Christ.”


On the surface, Paul’s explanation is astonishing. What could possibly have been lacking in the afflictions of Christ? Did Christ only half-finish His redemptive work, leaving it to Paul to complete it? Was Jesus overstating the case when He cried from the cross, “It is finished”? What exactly was lacking in the suffering of Christ?


In terms of the value of Jesus’ suffering, it is blasphemous to suggest anything was lacking. The merit of His atoning sacrifice is infinite. Nothing could possibly be added to His perfect obedience to make it even more perfect. Nothing can be more perfect than perfect. What is absolutely perfect cannot be augmented.


The merit of Jesus’ suffering is sufficient to atone for every sin that has ever been or ever will be committed. His once-for-all atoning death needs no repetition (Heb. 10:10). Old Testament sacrifices were repeated precisely because they were imperfect shadows of the reality that was to come (Heb. 10:1).


It was not by accident that the Roman Catholic Church appealed to Paul’s words in Colossians 1:24 to support its concept of the treasury of merits, by which the merits of the saints are supposedly added to the merit of Christ to cover the deficiencies of sinners. This doctrine was at the eye of the Protestant Reformation tornado. It was this eclipse of the sufficiency and perfection of Christ’s suffering that was at the heart of Martin Luther’s protest.


Jesus suffered for us. Yet we are called to participate in His suffering

Though we vigorously deny Rome’s interpretation of this passage, we are still left with our question. If Paul’s suffering did not add merit to what was lacking in Christ’s sufferings, what did it add?


The answer to this difficult question lies in the broader teaching of the New Testament in regard to the believer’s call to participate in the humiliation of Christ. Our baptism signifies that we are buried with Christ. Paul repeatedly pointed out that unless we are willing to participate in the humiliation of Jesus, we will not participate in His exaltation (see 2 Timothy 2:11–12).


Paul rejoiced that his suffering was a benefit to the church. The church is called to imitate Christ. It is called to walk the Via Dolorosa. Paul’s favorite metaphor for the church was the image of the human body. The church is called the body of Christ. In one sense, it is proper to call the church the “continuing incarnation.” The church is really the mystical body of Christ on earth.


Christ so linked His church to Himself that when He first called Paul on the Damascus Road He said, “Saul, Saul, why do you persecute Me?” (Acts 9:4, emphasis added). Saul was not literally persecuting Jesus. Jesus had already ascended to heaven. He was already out of reach of Saul’s hostility. Saul was busy persecuting Christians. But Jesus felt such solidarity with His church that He regarded an attack upon His body, the church, as a personal attack on Himself.


The church is not Christ. Christ is perfect; the church is imperfect. Christ is the Redeemer; the church is the company of the redeemed. However, the church belongs to Christ. The church is redeemed by Christ. The church is the bride of Christ. The church is indwelt by Christ.


In light of this solidarity, the church participates in Christ’s suffering. But this participation adds nothing to Christ’s merit. The sufferings of Christians may benefit other people, but they always fall short of atonement. I cannot atone for anyone’s sins, not even for my own. Yet my suffering may be of great benefit to other people. It may also serve as a witness to the One whose sufferings were an atonement.


The word for “witness” in the New Testament, martus, is the source of the English word martyr. Those who suffered and died for the cause of Christ were called martyrs because by their suffering they bore witness to Christ.


What is lacking in the afflictions of Jesus is the ongoing suffering that God calls His people to endure. God calls people of every generation to suffer. Again, this suffering is not to fulfill any deficiency in the merit of Christ, but to fulfill our destinies as witnesses to the perfect Suffering Servant of God.


Because of Christ, our suffering is not useless

What does this mean in practical terms? My father suffered a series of cerebral hemorrhages that caused him great suffering and eventually ended his life. I’m sure that while he was suffering he must have asked God, “Why?” On the surface, his suffering seemed useless. It seemed as though his pain was for no good reason.


I must be very careful. I do not think that my father’s suffering was in any way an atonement for my sins. Neither do I think I can read God’s mind with respect to the ultimate reason for my father’s suffering. But I know this: my father’s suffering made a profound impact on my life. It was through my father’s death that I was brought to Christ. I am not saying that the ultimate reason my father was called to suffer and die was so that I could become a Christian. I don’t know the sovereign purpose of God in it. But I do know that God used that suffering in a redemptive way for me. My dad’s suffering drove me into the arms of the Suffering Savior.


We are followers of Christ. We follow Him to the Garden of Gethsemane. We follow Him into the hall of judgment. We follow Him along the Via Dolorosa. We follow Him unto death. But the gospel declares that we also follow Him through the gates of heaven. Because we suffer with Him, we also shall be raised with Him. If we are humiliated with Him, we also shall be exalted with Him.


Because of Christ, our suffering is not useless. It is part of the total plan of God, who has chosen to redeem the world through the pathway of suffering.

Friday, January 3, 2014

Expository Preaching and “Proclaiming Christ”

In addition to providing content which explores a wide range of pertinent and contemporary theological issues, the Reformed Forum has sought to provide specific biblical content, particularly through its program “Proclaiming Christ.” In Proclaiming Christ we talk about preaching. We began the program with four foundational episodes that discussed the nature and purpose of preaching as well as some hermeneutical guidelines for the task. We then went on to our primary task: applying those principles to specific biblical texts – namely, the book of Genesis.


Having just recorded a couple more episodes, I wanted to answer this question: how do we actually define preaching – specifically expository preaching – the kind that seeks to bring to light the truth of the text? Many representative definitions have been offered. Haddon Robinson’s classic Biblical Preaching defines it as “the communication of a biblical concept, derived from and transmitted through a historical, grammatical, and literary study of a passage in its context, which the Holy Spirit first applies to the personality and experience of the preacher, then through him to his hearers.”(1) Sidney Greidanus comes closer by defining it: “handling the text ‘in such a way that its real and essential meaning as it existed in the mind of the particular biblical writer and as it existed in the light of the over-all context of Scripture is made plain and applied to the present-day needs of the hearers.’”(2) Brian Chapell defines it as “a message whose structure and thought are derived from a biblical text, that covers the scope of the text, and that explains the features and context of the text in order to disclose the enduring principles for faithful thinking, living, and worship intended by the Spirit, who inspired the text.”(3) Graeme Goldsworthy notes that some have suggested that the term “expository” should be dropped altogether in favor simply of “biblical” preaching.(4) I’m not convinced of this myself as the moniker “biblical” is claimed by more positions on preaching than there are flavors of Baskin Robbins. But the point is well taken that if we are to expose the text then “we must then proceed to ask how the meaning of the text is thus exposed.”(5)


With that in mind, allow me to propose a definition of expository preaching – one that seeks neither to be too restrictive nor too broad, but yet one that fills what I consider to be a gap in many contemporary definitions. A hat tip here to Jim Cassidy for helping me not make this definition too cumbersome.


Expository preaching is the Spirit empowered proclamation of God’s herald in which the text of Scripture is revealed not only in its original context, but in its consummate redemptive purpose, as it sets forth the person and work of Christ, with a view to the salvation of souls and the enabling of believers to live out its message.


This is the definition out of which I work in preaching, and also what I trust comes through in Proclaiming Christ. Not all of the panelists of the program might necessarily adhere to this definition particularly, but I do think it describes the general sentiments of the program. We seek to bring to light the truth of the text itself and expose the listener to that text’s specific content as it is revealed within its context and place in the canon, and fulfilled as part of the Scriptural whole.


I’d like to walk through each element of this definition, and hope later to offer further thoughts on one particular aspect: the eschatological or “consummate redemptive purpose” dimension. I welcome your feedback.


Spirit Empowered


The most crucial element in preparation and proclamation is the materially invisible but spiritually indispensable empowerment of the Spirit. That same Spirit who moved upon the original creation bringing it to life (Gen. 1:2), also moves upon the new creation bringing life as the word of God begins to work (John 3:8; 6:63; I Peter 1:12). The Spirit stirs the message in the heart of the preacher (Luke 24:49; Acts 17:16; 18:25), illumines his understanding (I Cor. 2:10; John 16:13), empowers the preaching (Micah 3:8; Acts 1:8; I Cor. 2:4; I Thess. 1:5), convicts and converts the sinner (John 3:5; James 1:18; I John 5:6-11), and enables the believer’s walk (I Peter 1:2; Eph. 3:16; Gal. 5:22). In light of voluminous biblical data, preaching without the Spirit’s empowerment is hopeless folly, preaching with it is boundless efficacy.


The Proclamation of God’s Herald


Expository preaching is not a matter of offering a subjective opinion, but making an authoritative declaration. Khrussw, the most prominent New Testament word for preaching, predominantly speaks of the announcement of a herald, (6) stressing the message as a thing which is given to the messenger, and not sourced in his own authority (John 3:1; Matt 12:41; I Tim 2:7).(7) Functionally related to Khrussw, euaggelizw speaks of announcing good news with an emphasis on the news as a received message,(8) and not one sourced in the messenger. Two other prominent words, marturia and didaskw, are also closely connected, particularly when speaking of the authority of Christ himself.(9) Thus the preponderance of scriptural terms for preaching speak not of the messenger, but of the source of the message.


The Text of Scripture Is Revealed


It is thus imperative that expository preaching exposes the meaning of the words of God set forth in the text itself. The word “exposition” extends from the Latin exponere,(10) which means to set forth, explain, or expose.(11) The preacher is to take the text of God’s word and bring it to light, exposing its meaning to the listener, and exposing the listener to its power. While there are many styles of preaching (topical, systematic, etc.), all true preaching is expository in nature,(12) and rooted in the text of Scripture. Paul’s charge to Timothy is to ??????? t?? ????? – preach the Word (I Tim. 4:2), and “rightly handle the word of truth” (II Timothy 2:15). His preaching task was to “bring to light for everyone” – the plan of God for salvation (Eph. 3:9).


In Its Original Context


Scripture was not written in a vacuum, but was deposited in a particular context which informs its meaning. Thus the preacher’s first hermeneutical task “is to relate the text to its immediate theological horizon,” and then to the surrounding canon.(13) The details of context inform the meanings of words, and only after these considerations should the preacher move to specific meaning, broader fulfillment, and contemporary application. Without such consideration the text becomes a confused fragmentation of definitions and un-relatable terms at times manipulated to promote the intention of the messenger, rather than the revelation of the message giver.


In Its Consummate Redemptive Purpose


The infallible rule of the interpretation of Scripture is that one must interpret Scripture with Scripture (WCF 1.9). Scripture does not have a meaning determined by man (II Pet. 1:20), but by God, and thus accurately to determine meaning one must turn to God’s recorded words. Ultimate interpretation must take into consideration the whole of God’s revelation. Thus individual texts do not become isolated fountain heads for dogma, but fit within a divine theological paradigm revealed through the warp and woof of biblical revelation. This paradigm is often referred to in terms of “biblical theology,” which underscores the “massive inner coherence of the divine plot in salvation history.”(14) While each text must be interpreted in light of its context, there is a “concordant unity”(15) which ties each part to a unified whole. “The text is part of one unified word from God. The whole Bible is the context of the text.”(16) Scripture’s unified story leads to a consummate goal: the manifestation of the glory of God through his work of redemption. From the first promise of the gospel in Genesis 3:15 the story of Scripture is consistently forward-looking.(17) The biblical agenda for preaching as expressed in Col. 1:27 includes presenting everyone mature in Christ, as through the preaching of the word believers are transformed as they await the consummation (I Cor. 1:8). The larger agenda of preaching is “the continued formation of a community that awaits the parousia”(18) (cf. I Thess 2).


It Sets Forth the Person and Work of Christ


The central element preaching must always be the revelation of the person and work of Jesus Christ. Though the Paul preached primarily from the Old Testament, he resolutely declares “we preach Christ crucified” (I Cor. 1:23), determining in his preaching “not to know anything among you except Jesus Christ and him crucified” (I Cor. 2:2; cf II Cor. 4:4, 5). The content of his preaching centered always on “the unsearchable riches of Christ” (Eph. 3:8). Christ is the central message of the Scriptures as he himself testified (Luke 24:27), and the central content of the disciples’ preaching (Acts 5:42; 11:20; cf. Rom. 16:25). Thus a “proper interpretation of any part of the Bible requires us to relate it to the person and work of Jesus.”(19)


A View to the Salvation of Souls


The salvation of souls comes primarily through the preaching of the word by the herald sent by the church for that task (Romans 10:14, 15). Preaching is the means by which the call to repentance is issued (Matt. 3:1; 12:41; Luke 3:3; 11:32), reconciliation is offered (Acts 10:36), and by which the gospel of the kingdom is proclaimed (Mark 1:14; Acts 20:25). It is the means by which the Holy Spirit grants faith (I Cor. 2:4). The people of God are set apart through the word (John 17:17), because that word of truth is “the gospel of your salvation” (Eph. 1:13), and the means by which the children of God are given birth (James 1:18).


The Enabling of Believers to Live Out Its Message


The believer is sanctified by the word of God (John 17:17), which means that the word not only provides information, but empowerment to godly living. In preaching one must “move from the truths of the text to the theme, thoughts, and thrust of the text expressed homiletically.”(20) That is, preaching remains in embryo until it develops the imperative. The objective teaching of the text – the indicative – must be developed into the imperative thrust of the text. The one who has seen Christ must also understand what it is to live in Christ. “The person who has died to sin no longer lives and acts in the sphere or realm of sin”(21) (cf. Rom. 6:10). When we have heard the preaching of Christ, we are compelled to live for Christ – as certainly as he has been resurrected (II Cor. 5:14). This not only affects our minds (Col. 3:1), but our bodies (Rom. 12:1), words (Eph. 4:29) and conduct (I Pet. 1:15; II Pet. 3:11). The life enabled by the power of the gospel “consists not only in having once been raised with Christ and in having been placed under a new rule, but also in being renewed from day to day (2 Cor. 4:16).”(22) To be faithful to the text however, the content of the imperative must not be an invention of the preacher, but must be derived from the indicative of the text. “The imperative is grounded on the reality that has been given with the indicative, appeals to it, and is intended to bring it to full development.”(23)


Good preaching will certainly effect change, instruct, and edify. But its primary purpose is to proclaim the person and work of Christ in the power of the Holy Spirit, from the perspective of the believer seated in the heavenly places, that God may be glorified and believers may be empowered to live out their union with Christ. Anything short of this misses the mark. I hope each of these elements comes through in nearly every episode of Proclaiming Christ.


His grateful servant,
Mark A. Winder
Pastor, Wolf River Presbyterian Church, Collierville, Tennessee
901-853-5556
www.wolfriverchurch.org.


NOTES


1 Haddon Robbinson, Biblical Preaching: The Development and Delivery of Expository Messages (Grand Rapids: Baker book House, 1980), 20.


2 Sidney Greidanus, The Modern Preacher and the Ancient Text: Interpreting and Preaching Biblical Literature (Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1988), 11.


3 Brian Chapell, Christ Centered Preaching: Redeeming the Expository Sermon, 2nd ed. (Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2005), 31.


4 Graeme Goldsworthy, Preaching the Whole Bible As Christian Scripture (Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 2000), 121.


5 Ibid.


6 Walter Bauer, A Greek English Lexicon of the New Testament, trans. William F. Arndt and F. Wilbur Gingrich (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1957), 432.


7 Stuart Olyott, Preaching Pure and Simple (Bryntirion, Bridgend, UK: Bryntirion Press, 2005), 12.


8 Bauer, 317.


9 Edmund Clowney, Preaching and Biblical Theology (Grand Rapids: William B. Erdmans Publishing Company, 1961), 57ff.


10 Glynnis Chantrell,ed., The Oxford Dictionary of Word Histories (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002), 192.


11 Frederic M. Wheelock, Wheelock’s Latin, 6th ed. (New York: Harper Collins Publishers, 2000), 474.


12 Sinclair Ferguson, “Exegesis,” in The Preacher and Preaching: Reviving the Art in the 20th Century, ed. Samuel Logan (Phillipsburg: Presbyterian and Reformed Publishing Company, 1986), 192.


13 Clowney, 88.


14 Goldsworthy, 17.


15 Richard Gaffin, “The Redemptive-Historical View,” in Biblical Hermeneutics: Five Views, eds. Stanley Porter and Beth Stovell (Downers Grove, Illinois: InterVarsity Press, 2012), 97.


16 Ibid., 16.


17 From Genesis 3:15 to the subsequent confirmations and expansions of God’s covenant promise, to the establishment of a typological kingdom in Israel, to the expectations of the prophets, to the eschatological horizon of the New Testament, the movement of redemptive history is a consistent “straining forward to what lies ahead,” pressing “on toward the goal for the prize of the upward call of God in Christ Jesus” (Philippians 3:13, 14).


18 James Thompson, Preaching Like Paul (Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press, 2001), 90.


19 Goldsworthy, 84.


20 Stephen Olford and David Olford, Anointed Expository Preaching (Nashville: B&H Academic, 1998), 155.


21 John Murray, Principles of Conduct: Aspects of Biblical Ethics (Grand Rapids: William B. Erdmans Publishing Company, 1957), 204.


22 Herman Ridderbos, Paul: An Outline of His Theology, trans. John R. Dewitt. (Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1966), 224.


23 Ibid., 255.

Thursday, December 26, 2013

Christ According to the Flesh and Spirit

There has been something of an intramural debate*–over the past Century and a half–concerning Paul’s use of the sa??/p?e?µa (i.e. flesh/Spirit) distinction in relation to the Person and work of Christ in Romans 1:3-4. The old school, represented by Warfield, Hodge, Cranfield et al, held that Paul was merely referring to the two natures of Christ when he declared that He was “the seed of David according to the flesh” and “declared to be the Son of God with power according to the Spirit of Holiness through the resurrection of the dead.” Warfield explained his understanding of these verses when he wrote:



This is fundamentally, then, how Paul preached Christ – as the Son of God in this supereminent sense, and therefore our divine Lord on whom we absolutely depend and to whom we owe absolute obedience. But this was not all that he was accustomed to preach concerning Christ. Paul preached the historical Jesus as well as the eternal Son of God. And between these two designations – Son of God, our Lord Jesus Christ – he inserts two clauses which tell us how he preached the historical Jesus. All that he taught about Christ was thrown up against the background of His deity: He is the Son of God, our Lord. But who is this that is thus so fervently declared to be the Son of God and our Lord? It is in the two clauses which are now to occupy our attention that Paul tells us.


If we reduce what he tells us to its lowest terms it amounts just to this: Paul preached the historical Christ as the promised Messiah and as the very Son of God. But he declares Christ to be the promised Messiah and the very Son of God in language so pregnant, so packed with implications, as to carry us into the heart of the great problem of the two-natured person of Christ. The exact terms in which he describes Christ as the promised Messiah and the very Son of God are these: “Who became of the seed of David according to the flesh, who was marked out as the Son of God in power according to the Spirit of holiness by the resurrection of the dead.” This in brief is the account which Paul gives of the historical Christ whom he preached.


Of course there is a temporal succession suggested in the declarations of the two clauses. They so far give us not only a description of the historical Christ, but the life-history of the Christ that Paul preached. Jesus Christ became of the seed of David at His birth and by His birth. He was marked out as the Son of God in power only at His resurrection and by His resurrection. But it was not to indicate this temporal succession that Paul sets the two declarations side by side. It emerges merely as the incidental, or we may say even the accidental, result of their collocation. The relation in which Paul sets the two declarations to one another is a logical rather than a temporal one: it is the relation of climax. His purpose is to exalt Jesus Christ. He wishes to say the great things about Him. And the two greatest things he has to say about Him in His historical manifestation are these – that He became of the seed of David according to the flesh, that He was marked out as the Son of God in power according to the Spirit of holiness by the resurrection of the dead.


In contrast to Warfield’s ontological view, Geerhardus Vos explained the redemptive-historical view in the following way:



The analogy, and its bearing upon our problem become most clear when the passage, Rom. 1.3-4, is somewhat closely analyzed. Here we read that Jesus was ???s?e?t?? ???? ?e?? e? d??aµe? ?ata p?e?µa a???s???? e? a?astase?? ?e????. The clause stands in parallelism to the one in vs. 3: ?e??µe??? e? spe?µat?? daß?d ?ata sa??a. It will be noticed that the following members correspond to each other in the two clauses: ?e??µe???————???s?e??; ?ata sa??a————?ata p?e?µa a???s????; e? spe?µat?? daß?d————e? a?astase?? ?e????. The reference is not to two coexisting states in the make-up of the Savior, but two successive stages in his life. There was first ?e?es?a? ?ata sa??a, then a ???s???a? ?ata p?e?µa. The two prepositional phrases have adverbial force, yet so as to throw emphasis on the result no less than on the initial act: He became, as to his sarkic (fleshly) existence, and He was “of the seed of David.” The ???s???a? Paul refers to is not an abstract determination, but an effectual installation, with bestowal of the requisite energy pertaining to the new state. Paul seems to avoid the repetition of ?e??µe???, not so much for stylistic reasons, but because it might have suggested, even before the reading of the sentence to the end could correct this, that at the resurrection the sonship of Christ, as such, first originated, whereas his actual meaning is that the sonship ?ata d??aµ?? there began to enter into operation. By the twofold ?ata the manner of each state of existence is contrasted, by the twofold e? the sphere of origin of each. As to the one He was “from the seed of David,” as to the other He was “out of resurrection from the dead.” The resurrection (both of Jesus and believers) is therefore according to Paul the entering upon a new phase of sonship characterized by the possession and exercise of unique supernatural power. That this should apply to Christ’s body alone, or to the exertion by Chris of somatic power on the bodies of believers alone, while not here expressly denied, is in itself highly implausible.


The above interpretation does not, of course, imply that Paul denied the supernatural conception of Jesus by the Spirit. Precisely because speaking of the pneuma-state in the absolute eschatological sense, he could disregard here the previous Spirit-birth and the Spirit-endowment at the baptism.2


Following Vos’ exegesis, the late John Murray also held that Romans 1:3-4 was teaching two progressive stages in the redemptive-historical experience of Jesus. He helpfully explained what the shift in the two stages of experience meant in the life of Jesus–and for believers–when he wrote:



Just as “according to the flesh” in verse 3 defines the phase which came to be through being born of the seed of David, so “according to the Spirit of holiness” characterizes the phase which came to be through the resurrection. And when we ask what that new phase was upon which the Son of God entered by his resurrection, there is copious New Testament allusion and elucidation (cf. Acts 2:36; Eph. 1:20–23; Phil. 2:9–11; 1 Pet. 3:21, 22). By his resurrection and ascension the Son of God incarnate entered upon a new phase of sovereignty and was endowed with new power correspondent with and unto the exercise of the mediatorial lordship which he executes as head over all things to his body, the church. It is in this same resurrection context and with allusion to Christ’s resurrection endowment that the apostle says, “The last Adam was made life-giving Spirit” (1 Cor. 15:45). And it is to this that he refers elsewhere when he says, “The Lord is the Spirit” (2 Cor. 3:17). “Lord” in this instance, as frequently in Paul, is the Lord Christ. The only conclusion is that Christ is now by reason of the resurrection so endowed with and in control of the Holy Spirit that, without any confusion of the distinct persons, Christ is identified with the Spirit and is called “the Lord of the Spirit” (2 Cor. 3:18). Thus, when we come back to the expression “according to the Spirit of holiness”, our inference is that it refers to that stage of pneumatic endowment upon which Jesus entered through his resurrection. The text, furthermore, expressly relates “Son of God with power according to the Spirit of holiness” with “the resurrection from the dead” and the appointment can be none other than that which came to be by the resurrection. The thought of verse 4 would then be that the lordship in which he was instated by the resurrection is one all-pervasively conditioned by pneumatic powers. The relative weakness of his pre-resurrection state, reflected on in verse 3, is contrasted with the triumphant power exhibited in his post-resurrection lordship. What is contrasted is not a phase in which Jesus is not the Son of God and another in which he is. He is the incarnate Son of God in both states, humiliation and exaltation, and to regard him as the Son of God in both states belongs to the essence of Paul’s gospel as the gospel of God. But the pre-resurrection and post-resurrection states are compared and contrasted, and the contrast hinges on the investiture with power by which the latter is characterized.3


John Skilton, in his outstanding 1996 WTJ article “A Glance At Some Old Problems in First Peter,” appealed to the redemptive-historical take on Romans 1:3-4 for arriving at a conclusion on the difficult exegesis of 1 Peter 3:18-20 :



Readers of the NT have been puzzled at times by statements that seem to indicate that our Lord has become something that he already had been before. For example, in Matt 28:18, Jesus says: “All power has been given unto me in heaven and on earth.” The reader asks, “Did he not have all power previously?” In Acts 2:36, Peter says: “Therefore let all the house of Israel know assuredly that God has made that same Jesus whom you have crucified both Lord and Christ.” One inquires, “Was not Jesus both Lord and Christ already?” Other verses raise similar questions. The answer to these questions will be found in a right understanding of 1 Pet 3:18. At the close of that verse Peter writes:?a?at??e?? µ?? sa??? ???p????e?? d? p?e?µat?. Here we have a balanced structure that contributes substantially to the interpretation. For example, in their tight parallelism we expect both sa??? and p?e?µat? to be used in the same way. Mounce claims that the translation in the NIV, “in the body…by the Spirit,” has two faults:


First, the words “body” and “spirit” are parallel and should be translated in the same manner (both are in the dative case and the NIV’s “in the body…but…by the Spirit” is misleading). Second, the capital S on “Spirit” interprets the word to mean the Holy Spirit. In other words the clause is made to say that Jesus died physically but was resurrected by the Holy Spirit. While this theology is certainly orthodox, it is not what the text actually says. Flesh and spirit represent two spheres of existence or two successive conditions of Christ’s human nature…


…Marked off in 1 Pet 3:18, as in Rom 1:3–4, would be two successive stages in our Lord’s messianic work. These different stages are reflected also in such verses as Matt 28:18 and Acts 2:36, which were mentioned earlier. The second stage, introduced by the resurrection, was “one all-pervasively conditioned by pneumatic powers.” The p?e?µat? in 1 Pet 3:18 accordingly refers not only to the resurrection, but also to the state of power that followed it.4


While Warfield’s position falls entirely within the realm of the analogy of Scripture and analogy of faith, it does not do full justice to the exegetical construct of Romans 1:3-4. Much more satisfying is the explanation provided by Vos, Murray, Skilton, Gaffin et al. Understanding the sa??/p?e?µa (i.e. flesh/Spirit) distinction in redemptive history helps us understand more of what we have as believers living in the new age (i.e. the age of the Spirit).


1. B. B. Warfield, “The Christ That Paul Preached,” in The Person and Work of Christ (ed. Samuel G. Craig; Philadelphia: Presbyterian and Reformed, 1950), 73-90.


2. Geerhards Vos The Pauline Eschatology (Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans, 1961) n. 10 pp. 155-156. For a continued treatment of this passage see Vos’ chapter, “The Eschatological Aspect of the Pauline Concept of the Spirit” in the Princeton Seminary Biblical and Theological Studies p. 228ff.


3. John Murray, The Epistle to the Romans (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1964) 6.


4. John H. Skilton, ”A Glance At Some Old Problems in First Peter,” (Westminster Theological Journal 58:1 (Spr 96) p. 6


*See Lee Irons 10 posts defending Warfield’s position.

Wednesday, December 25, 2013

Celebrity Pastors for the Glory of Christ

“With him we are sending the brother who is famous among all the churches for his preaching of the gospel.”  2 Corinthians 8:18


When I was at the 2012 Together For The Gospel meeting, there was a panel discussion on celebrity pastors.  Dr. Carl Trueman was on the panel, cautioning against the perils and dangers of the celebrity pastor.  While I certainly agreed with the majority of his concerns and cautions, I wanted to ask him if he taught a “celebrity” church history class. In other words, did he focus on the pastors/theologians that no one had ever heard of, or did he cover Augustine, Luther, Calvin, and the many other “famous” figures in church history? After all, he did mention that Luther was the first celebrity pastor in Protestantism. Surely he teaches about the lives and ministries of celebrities in his church history class.


The Biblical and historical fact of the matter on celebrity pastors is this:  The LORD sovereignly chooses to make people great in the eyes of the world for the purpose of making His own name great and to be a blessing to the world through the Gospel.


He did so with Abraham:  “Now the LORD said to Abram, ‘Go from your country and your kindred and your father’s house to the land that I will show you.  And I will make of you a great nation, and I will bless you and make your name great, so that you will be a blessing.’” (Genesis 12:1-2)


He did so with Joseph:  “The LORD was with Joseph, and he became a successful man, and he was in the house of his Egyptian master.  His master saw that the LORD was with him and that the LORD caused all that he did to succeed in his hands . . . But the LORD was with Joseph and showed him steadfast love and gave him favor in the sight of the keeper of the prison . . . The keeper of the prison paid no attention to anything that was in Joseph’s charge, because the LORD was with him. And whatever he did, the LORD made it succeed.” (Genesis 39:2-3, 21, 23)


He did so with Moses:  “And the LORD said to Moses, ‘See, I have made you like God to Pharaoh . . . .’” (Exodus 7:1)


He did so with Joshua:  “The LORD said to Joshua, ‘Today I will begin to exalt you in the sight of all Israel, that they may know that, as I was with Moses, so I will be with you.’” (Joshua 3:7)


He did so with David:  “Now, therefore, thus you shall say to my servant David, ‘Thus says the LORD of hosts, I took you from the pasture, from following the sheep, that you should be prince over my people Israel.  And I have been with you wherever you went and have cut off all your enemies from before you. And I will make for you a great name, like the name of the great ones of the earth.’” (2 Samuel 7:8-9)


He did so with His own beloved Son:  “Have this mind among yourselves, which is yours in Christ Jesus, who, though he was in the form of God, did not count equality with God a thing to be grasped, but made himself nothing, taking the form of a servant, being born in the likeness of men.  And being found in human form, he humbled himself by becoming obedient to the point of death, even death on a cross.  Therefore God has highly exalted him and bestowed on him the name that is above every name, so that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth, and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.” (Philippians 2:5-11)


He’s done it with Augustine, Luther, Calvin, Edwards, Spurgeon, Lloyd-Jones, and many other faithful preachers and theologians in our own day. 


And He does so now with whomever He pleases:  “The LORD kills and brings to life; he brings down to Sheol and raises up.  The LORD makes poor and makes rich; he brings low and he exalts.  He raises up the poor from the dust; he lifts the needy from the ash heap to make them sit with princes and inherit a seat of honor.  For the pillars of the earth are the LORD’s, and on them he has set the world.” (1 Samuel 2:6-8)


“For not from the east or from the west and not from the wilderness comes lifting up, but it is God who executes judgment, putting down one and lifting up another.” (Psalm 75:6-7)


What should we do in light of these truths?


1.  Let us remember that the LORD doesn’t need us:


“Whatever the LORD pleases, he does, in heaven and on earth, in the seas and all deeps.” (Psalm 135:6)


“Behold, the LORD’s hand is not shortened, that it cannot save, or his ear dull, that it cannot hear.” (Isaiah 59:1)


“The God who made the world and everything in it, being Lord of heaven and earth, does not live in temples made by man, nor is he served by human hands, as though he needed anything, since he himself gives to all mankind life and breath and everything.” (Acts 17:24-25)


“God is able from these stones to raise up children for Abraham.” (Matthew 3:9)


2.  Let us remember that the LORD grants all mercies, ministries, and positions in His Church as He sees fit:


“I will have mercy on whom I have mercy, and I will have compassion on whom I have compassion.” (Romans 9:15)


“For who sees anything different in you? What do you have that you did not receive? If then you received it, why do you boast as if you did not receive it?” (1 Corinthians 4:7)


“For by the grace given to me I say to everyone among you not to think of himself more highly than he ought to think, but to think with sober judgment, each according to the measure of faith that God has assigned.” (Romans 12:3)


 “Therefore, having this ministry by the mercy of God, we do not lose heart.” (2 Corinthians 4:1)


“For just as the body is one and has many members, and all the members of the body, though many, are one body, so it is with Christ . . . But as it is, God arranged the members in the body, each one of them, as he chose . . . But God has so composed the body . . . And God has appointed in the church . . . .” (1 Corinthians 12:12, 18, 24, 28)


3.  Let us remember that the LORD delights in and lifts up the humble:


“The LORD lifts up the humble; he casts the wicked to the ground.” (Psalm 147:6)


“For thus says the One who is high and lifted up, who inhabits eternity, whose name is Holy: ‘I dwell in the high and holy place, and also with him who is of a contrite and lowly spirit, to revive the spirit of the lowly, and to revive the heart of the contrite.’” (Isaiah 57:15)


“God opposes the proud but gives grace to the humble.” (1 Peter 5:5)


“The greatest among you shall be your servant.  Whoever exalts himself will be humbled, and whoever humbles himself will be exalted.” (Matthew 23:11-12)


“If anyone would be first, he must be last of all and servant of all.” (Mark 9:35)


4.  Let us consider all other preachers (and people!) better than ourselves:


“Do nothing from rivalry or conceit, but in humility count others more significant than yourselves.” (Philippians 2:3)


5.  Let us seek the LORD to build our ministry or all is vanity:


“Unless the LORD builds the house, those who build it labor in vain.  Unless the LORD watches over the city, the watchman stays awake in vain.” (Psalm 127:1)


6.  Let us forget about ourselves and exult in the glory, beauty, and satisfaction of Jesus Christ alone – Who is the greatest and most famous One, but was made nothing on that cross so that we might have all in all in Him!


“But whatever gain I had, I counted as loss for the sake of Christ.  Indeed, I count everything as loss because of the surpassing worth of knowing Christ Jesus my Lord.  For his sake I have suffered the loss of all things and count them as rubbish, in order that I may gain Christ and be found in him, not having a righteousness of my own that comes from the law, but that which comes through faith in Christ, the righteousness from God that depends on faith – that I may know him and the power of his resurrection, and may share his sufferings, becoming like him in his death, that by any means possible I may attain the resurrection from the dead.” (Philippians 3:7-11)


If Christ is all to a pastor of any church, he will not be jealous of the celebrity status of others or the Gospel growth and success of other churches, but he will pray with as much passion and zeal for other pastors, churches, and ministries as he prays for himself and his own. So let us pray prayers like this . . .


Oh Father, please cause all the churches around me that preach the Gospel faithfully to grow to overflowing and become mega-churches like the church in Acts where thousands were added to their number in one day!


Please grant the faithful pastors around me to increase in influence for Jesus! Grant them to write the best-selling books that make much of Jesus, save sinners, edify the church, and glorify God! Please make these other pastors great like you made your servant Abraham great so that, like Abraham, they might be a blessing to the nations.


Please grant me to find as much joy in these other church’s Gospel success as if it were my own Gospel success! May their Gospel success only serve to increase my joy in Jesus and in the triumph of the Gospel in this world!


Oh Father, please do all this because, above all, I want Christ to be all in all in the world! May His name become great in the world, and if that happens through others and not me, then all praise be to You – just make Your name great through any and all lawful means! May Christ increase, and may I decrease! Please simply cause me to be faithful to all that You’ve called me to do!


Thank you, oh Father, for the faithful mega-church pastors and best-selling Christ-exalting authors! Thank you for the Charles Spurgeon’s, John Piper’s, John MacArthur’s, R. C. Sproul’s, David Platt’s, and Matt Chandler’s! Make more of them oh God, and spread the fame of Your great name through them! You are a Mega God! And You deserve for all peoples everywhere to bow down and worship You! Fill all Your churches to overflowing and save sinners by the billions!


Please do it for Jesus’ sake and for His glory! Amen!

Monday, December 23, 2013

Do You Know Union with Christ?

James S. Stewart wrote that “union with Christ, rather than justification or election or eschatology, or indeed any of the other great apostolic themes, is the real clue to an understanding of Paul’s thought and experience” (A Man in Christ [Harper & Bros., 1955], vii).


John Calvin said that union with Christ has “the highest degree of importance” if we are to understand justification correctly (Institutes 1:737).


John Murray wrote that “union with Christ is . . . the central truth of the whole doctrine of salvation. . . . It is not simply a phase of the application of redemption; it underlies every aspect of redemption” (Redemption—Accomplished and Applied [Eerdmans, 1955], pp. 201, 205).


Lewis Smedes said that it was “at once the center and circumference of authentic human existence” (Union with Christ [Eerdmans, 1983], xii).


Anthony Hoekema wrote that “Once you have your eyes opened to this concept of union with Christ, you will find it almost everywhere in the New Testament” (Saved by Grace [Eerdmans, 1989], 64.


Hoekema explains that the New Testament uses two interchangeable expressions to describe union with Christ:

We are in Christ (2 Cor. 5:17; John 15:4, 5, 7; 1 Cor. 15:22; 2 Cor. 12:2; Gal. 3:28; Eph. 1:4, 2:10; Phil. 3:9; 1 Thess. 4:16; 1 John 4:13).Christ is in us (Gal. 2:20; Col. 1:27; Rom. 8:10; 2 Cor. 13:5; Eph. 3:17).

Three passages (John 6:56; John 15:4; 1 John 4:13) explicitly combine both concepts.


Hoekema says that we should see union with Christ “extending all the way from eternity to eternity.” He outlines his material in this way:

The roots of union with Christ are in divine election (Eph. 1:3-4).The basis of union with Christ is the redemptive work of Christ.The actual union with Christ is established with God’s people in time.

Under the third point, he shows eight ways that salvation, from beginning to end, is in Christ:

We are initially united with Christ in regeneration (Eph. 2:4-5, 10)We appropriate and continue to live out of this union through faith (Gal. 2:20; Eph. 3:16-17).We are justified in union with Christ (1 Cor. 1:30; 2 Cor. 5:21; Phil. 3:8-9).We are sanctified through union with Christ (1 Cor. 1:30; John 15:4-5; Eph. 4:16; 2 Cor. 5:17).We persevere in the life of faith in union with Christ (John 10:27-28; Rom. 8:38-39).We are even said to die in Christ (Rom. 14:8; 1 Thess. 4:16; Rev. 14:13).We shall be raised with Christ (Col. 3:1; 1 Cor. 15:22).We shall be eternally glorified with Christ (Col. 3:4; 1 Thess. 4:16-17).

And here’s a helpful quote from Sinclair Ferguson (in Christian Spirituality: Five Views of Sanctification [IVP, 1989], 58), explaining in a nutshell why union with Christ is the foundation for sanctification:



If we are united to Christ, then we are united to him at all points of his activity on our behalf.


We share

in his death (we were baptized into his death),in his resurrection (we are resurrected with Christ),in his ascension (we have been raised with him),in his heavenly session (we sit with him in heavenly places, so that our life is hidden with Christ in God), and we will sharein his promised return (when Christ, who is our life, appears, we also will appear with him in glory) (Rom. 6:14; Col. 2:11-12; 3:1-3).

This, then, is the foundation of sanctification in Reformed theology.


It is rooted, not in humanity and their achievement of holiness or sanctification, but in what God has done in Christ, and for us in union with him. Rather than view Christians first and foremost in the microcosmic context of their own progress, the Reformed doctrine first of all sets them in the macrocosm of God’s activity in redemptive history. It is seeing oneself in this context that enables the individual Christian to grow in true holiness.


Some newer treatments of this important subject:


Robert Letham, Union with Christ: In Scripture, History, and Theology


Marcus Peter Johnson, One with Christ: An Evangelical Theology of Salvation


Elyse M. Fitzpatrick, Found in Him: The Joy of the Incarnation and Our Union with Christ


Robert Peterson, Salvation Applied by the Spirit: Union with Christ (forthcoming, 2014)

Copyright © 2013 by the author listed above. Used by permission.

Sunday, December 22, 2013

Do You Believe in a Santa Christ?

In Sinclair Ferguson’s book, In Christ Alone, he shares the sad reality that many Christians have a Christology that is more informed by Santa Claus than Scripture. For them, the message of the incarnation has been so twisted or diluted that they have in fact created for themselves a savior who is nothing more than a Santa Christ.

As you prayerfully read Sinclair Ferguson’s words, ask yourself the following question this Christmas season: “Do I believe in a Santa Christ?”

Santa Christ is sometimes a Pelagian Jesus. Like Santa, he simply asks us whether we have been good. More exactly, since the assumption is that we are all naturally good, Santa Christ asks us whether we have been “good enough.” So just as Christmas dinner is simply the better dinner we really deserve, Jesus becomes a kind of added bonus who makes a good life even better. He is not seen as the Savior of helpless sinners.

Or Santa Christ may be a Semi-Pelagian Jesus — a slightly more sophisticated Jesus who, Santa-like, gives gifts to those who have already done the best they could! Thus, Jesus’ hand, like Santa’s sack, opens only when we can give an upper-percentile answer to the none-too-weighty probe, “Have you done your best this year?” The only difference from medieval theology here is that we do not use its Latin phraseology: facere quod in se est (to do what one is capable of doing on one’s own, or, in common parlance, “Heaven helps those who help themselves”).

Then again, Santa Christ may be a mystical Jesus, who, like Santa Claus, is important because of the good experiences we have when we think about him, irrespective of his historical reality. It doesn’t really matter whether the story is true or not; the important thing is the spirit of Santa Christ. For that matter, while it would spoil things to tell the children this, everyone can make up his or her own Santa Christ. As long as we have the right spirit of Santa Christ, all is well.

But Jesus is not to be identified with Santa Claus; worldly thinking — however much it employs Jesus-language — is not to be confused with biblical truth.

The Scriptures systematically strip away the veneer that covers the real truth of the Christmas story. Jesus did not come to add to our comforts. He did not come to help those who were already helping themselves or to fill life with more pleasant experiences. He came on a deliverance mission, to save sinners, and to do so He had to destroy the works of the Devil (Matt. 1:21; 1 John 3:8b).

Those whose lives were bound up with the events of the first Christmas did not find His coming an easy and pleasurable experience.Mary and Joseph’s lives were turned upside down.The shepherds’ night was frighteningly interrupted, and their futures potentially radically changed.The magi faced all kinds of inconvenience and family separation.Our Lord Himself, conceived before wedlock, born probably in a cave, would spend His early days as a refugee from the bloodthirsty and vindictive Herod (Matt. 2:13-21).

There is, therefore, an element in the Gospel narratives that stresses that the coming of Jesus is a disturbing event of the deepest proportions. It had to be thus, for He did not come merely to add something extra to life, but to deal with our spiritual insolvency and the debt of our sin. He was not conceived in the womb of Mary for those who have done their best, but for those who know that their best is “like filthy rags” (Isa. 64:6)—far from good enough—and that in their flesh there dwells no good thing (Rom. 7:18). He was not sent to be the source of good experiences, but to suffer the pangs of hell in order to be our Savior.

Adapted from In Christ Alone by Sinclair Ferguson.


View the original article here